Prediction models and morbidities associated to obstructive sleep apnea: An updated systematic review
Fatima Ezzahra Kasmaoui 1 2 * , Abdelhafid Benksim 1 3 4, El Mahjoub El Harsi 3 4, Mohamed Amine 1 2 5
More Detail
1 Laboratory biosciences and health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, MOROCCO
2 Clinical Research Service, University Hospital Mohammed VI Marrakech, MOROCCO
3 Nursing Care Department, Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques Marrakech, MOROCCO
4 Laboratory of Pharmacology, Neurobiology, Anthropobiology and Environment, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, MOROCCO
5 Department of Public Health, Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, MOROCCO
* Corresponding Author


Objective: We aim to present a systematic review using a literature update on the performance of clinical questionnaires in predicting the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome compared with polysomnography considered as the reference test to confirm obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
Source of evidence: Medline, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and ScienceDirect.
Methods: The article selection stage implemented the PRISMA diagram.
Results: The selected studies state that the Berlin questionnaire, the Epworth sleepiness scale, the STOP questionnaire, the STOP-BANG questionnaire, the ASA checklist, and the No-SAS score are the best performing screening tools to predict obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, as their performance was evaluated for different thresholds of apnea hypopnea index obtained using polysomnography.
Conclusion: The DES-OSA 50 and the No-SAS score are simples, effectives, and easy-to-implement scores to identify individuals at risk of sleep-disordered breathing; it can help clinicians decide which patients should be referred for polysomnography.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Review Article

ELECTRON J GEN MED, 2022 - Volume 19 Issue 4, Article No: em385

Publication date: 01 Jun 2022

Article Views: 170

Article Downloads: 121

Open Access References How to cite this article