• Mark KP, Herbenick D, Fortenberry JD, Sanders S, Reece M. A psychometric comparison of three scales and a single-item measure to assess sexual satisfaction. J Sex Res 2014;51(2):159-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.816261 PMid:24112135
• Noruzi S, Maarefvand M, Khankeh H, Eghlima M. Sexual satisfaction studies in Iran, a systematic review. Women Health Bull 2019;6(4):1-7. https://doi.org/10.30476/WHB.2019.45878
• Sanchez-Fuentes M, Salinas JM, Sierra JC. Use of an ecological model to study sexual satisfaction in a heterosexual Spanish sample. Arch Sex Behav 2016; 45(8):1973-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0703-9 PMid:26969318
• Sprecher S, Cate RM. Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In Handbook of sexuality in close relationships; JH Harvey, A Wenzel, S Sprecher, Eds.; Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004:235-56.
• Cao H, Zhou N, Fine MA, Li X, Fang X. Sexual satisfaction and marital satisfaction during the early years of Chinese marriage: A three-wave, cross-lagged, actor–partner interdependence model. J Sex Res 2019;56(3):391-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1463503 PMid:29746180
• Quinn-Nilas C. Relationship and sexual satisfaction: A developmental perspective on bidirectionality. J Soc Pers Relat 2020;37(2):624-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519876018
• Vowels LM, Mark KP. Relationship and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal actor–partner interdependence model approach. Sex Relation Ther 2020;35(1):46-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2018.1441991
• Deogan C, Jacobsson E, Mannheimer L, Björkenstam C. Are men who buy sex different from men who do not? Exploring sex life characteristics based on a randomized population survey in Sweden. Arch Sex Behav, 2020:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01843-3 PMid:33354757 PMCid:PMC8275502
• Pascoal PM, Narciso IDSB, Pereira NM, Ferreira AS. Validation process of the Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction in three samples of the portuguese population. Psicol Reflex Crit 2013;26(4):691-700. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000400009
• Blunt-Vinti H, Jozkowski KN, Hunt M. Show or tell? Does verbal and/or nonverbal sexual communication matter for sexual satisfaction? J Sex Marital Ther 2019;45(3):206-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2018.1501446 PMid:30040593
• Khodabakhshi-Koolaee A, MirAfzal NS. Relationship between humor and social support with sex satisfaction in elderly married women. J Gerontol 2017;2(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.29252/joge.2.1.1
• Ariapooran S, Raziani S. Sexual satisfaction, marital intimacy, and depression in married Iranian nurses with and without symptoms of secondary traumatic stress. Psychol Rep 2019;122(3):809-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118776927 PMid:29771198
• Higgins JA, Trussell J, Moore NB, Davidson JK. Virginity lost, satisfaction gained? Physiological and psychological sexual satisfaction at heterosexual debut. J Sex Res 2010; 47(4):384-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224491003774792 PMid:20401787 PMCid:PMC3572537
• Ji J, Norling AM. Sexual satisfaction of married urban Chinese. J Dev Soc 2004;20(1-2):21-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X04048301
• McNulty JK, Fisher TD. Gender differences in response to sexual expectancies and changes in sexual frequency: A short-term longitudinal study of sexual satisfaction in newly married couples. Arch Sex Behav 2008;37(2):229-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9176-1 PMid:17641964
• McClelland SI. Who is the “self” in self reports of sexual satisfaction? Research and policy implications. Sex Res Social Policy 2011;8(4):304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0067-9
• Santos-Iglesias P, Sierra Freire JC, García M, Martínez A, Sánchez A, Tapia MI. Índice de Satisfacción Sexual (ISS): un estudio sobre su fiabilidad y validez. J Psicol Ter Psicol 2009;9(2):259-23.
• Neto F, da Conceição Pinto M. A cross-cultural investigation of satisfaction with sex life among emerging adults. Soc Indic Res 2015;120(2):545-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0604-z
• Neto F, da Conceição Pinto M. The satisfaction with sex life across the adult life span. Soc Indic Res 2013;114(3):767-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0181-y
• Peixoto MM, Amarelo-Pires I, Pimentel Biscaia MS, Machado PP. Sexual self-esteem, sexual functioning and sexual satisfaction in Portuguese heterosexual university students. Psychol Sex 2018;9(4):305-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1491413
• Pascoal P M, Narciso IDSB, Pereira NM. What is sexual satisfaction? Thematic analysis of lay people’s definitions. J Sex Res 2014;51(1):22-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.815149 PMid:24070214
• Træen B, Štulhofer A, Janssen E, Carvalheira AA, Hald GM, Lange T, Graham C. Sexual activity and sexual satisfaction among older adults in four European countries. Arch Sex Behav 2019;48(3):815-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1256-x PMid:29987546
• Rust J, Golombok S. Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction. Windsor: NFER-Nelson Publishing Company 1986.
• Štulhofer A, Buško V, Brouillard P. Development and bicultural validation of the new sexual satisfaction scale. J Sex Res 2010;47(4):257-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903100561 PMid:19629836
• Lawrance K-A, Byers ES. Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Pers Relatsh 1995;2(4):267-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
• Meston C, Trapnell P. Outcomes assessment: Development and validation of a five‐factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale for women: The Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS‐W). J Sex Med 2005;2(1):66-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20107.x PMid:16422909 PMCid:PMC2859306
• Hudson WW, Harrison DF, Crosscup PC. A short-form scale to measure sexual discord women. J Sex Res 1981; 17(2):157-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498109551110
• Neto F. The satisfaction with sex life scale. Meas Eval Couns Dev 2012;45(1):18-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175611422898
• Diener ER, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess 1985;49:71-5. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 PMid:16367493
• Neto F. The Satisfaction with Love Life Scale. Meas Eval Couns Dev 2005;38:2-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2005.11909765
• Neto F, Fonseca AC. The Satisfaction with Migration Life Scale. Int J Intercult Relat 2016;54:47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.07.004
• Caycho-Rodríguez T, Ventura-León J, Barboza-Palomino M, Reyes-Bossio M, et al. Validez e invarianza factorial de una medida breve de Satisfacción con la Vida Familiar. Univ Psychologica 2018;17(5):1-17. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-5.vifm
• da Costa M P, Neto F. Psychometric evaluation of the Portuguese satisfaction with family life scale. Meas Instrum Soc Sci 2019;1(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-019-0009-5
• Caycho-Rodríguez T, Neto F, Reyes-Bossio M, Vilca LW, García Cadena CH, Pinto da Costa M, ... White M. Factorial invariance of Satisfaction with Family Life Scale in adolescents from Peru and Portugal. J Gen Psychol 2020;1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2020.1867496
• Caycho-Rodríguez T, Neto J, Tomás JM, Valencia PD, Ventura-León J, Neto F, ... Vilca LW. Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Job Life Scale in Portuguese workers: A systematic study based on the IRT and CFA modeling. Heliyon 2020;6(6):e03881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03881 PMid:32514482 PMCid:PMC7267718
• Neto F, Fonseca AC. The Satisfaction with Job Life Scale among Immigrants. Psychol Stud 2018;63(3):209-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0449-7
• Hambleton RK, Robin F, Xing D. Item response models for the analysis of educational and psychological test data. In Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling; HEA Tinsley, SD Brown Eds.; San Diego, CA: Academic Press 2000:553-585.
• Muñiz J. Introducción a la psicometría. Teoría clásica y TRI. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide; 2018.
• Schotanus-Dijkstra M, Peter M, Drossaert CH, Pieterse ME, Bolier L, Walburg, JA, Bohlmeijer ET. Validation of the Flourishing Scale in a sample of people with suboptimal levels of mental well-being. BMC psychol 2016;4(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0116-5 PMid:26988345 PMCid:PMC4794907
• Bourion-Bédès S, Schwan R, Epstein J, Laprevote V, Bédès A, Bonnet JL, Baumann C. Combination of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) analysis to study the psychometric properties of the French version of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF). Qual Life Res 2015;24(2):287-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0772-y PMid:25113237
• Dong Y, Dumas D. Are personality measures valid for different populations? A systematic review of measurement invariance across cultures, gender, and age. Personal Individ Differ 2020;160:109956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109956
• Putnick DL, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev 2016;41:71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 PMid: 27942093 PMCid:PMC5145197
• Caycho T. Importancia del análisis de invarianza factorial en estudios comparativos en Ciencias de la Salud. Rev Cuba Educ Medica Super 2017;31(2):1-3. Available at: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/educacion/cem-2017/cem172d.pdf
• Davidov E, Meuleman B, Cieciuch J, Schmidt P, Billiet J. Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annu Rev Sociol 2014;40:55-75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
• Van de Schoot R, Lugtig P, Hox J. A checklist for testing measurement invariance. Eur J Dev Psychol 2012;9(4):486-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
• Papalia DE, Feldman RD, Martorell G, Berber Morán E, Vázquez Herrera M. Desarrollo humano (12a ed.). México, D. F.: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2012.
• Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, Second Edition. Guilford Publications; 2015.
• Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press; 2015.
• Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition (4th ed.). Routledge; 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749105
• McDonald RP. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Taylor & Francis, 1999.
• Raykov T, Hancock GR. Examining change in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2005;58(1):65-82. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005X38753 PMid:15969840
• Reise SP, Scheines R, Widaman KF, Haviland MG. Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educ Psychol Meas 2013;73(1):5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831
• Rodriguez A, Reise SP, Haviland MG. Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychol Methods 2016;21(2):137-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045 PMid:26523435
• Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 2007;14(3): 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
• Samejima F. Graded response model. In Handbook of modern Item Response Theory; WJ Van der Linden, RK Hambleton (Eds.); New York, NY: Springer 1997:85-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_5
• Hambleton RK, van der Linden WJ, Wells CS. IRT models for the analysis of polytomously scored data: Brief and selected history of model building advances. In Handbook of polytomous item response models; ML Nering, R Ostini (Eds.); New York, NY: Routledge 2010:21-42.
• RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, Inc; 2018. Available at: http://www.rstudio.com/
• R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing (R version 3.6.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019. Available at: http://www.r-project.org/
• Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J Stat Softw 2012;48(2):1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
• Jorgensen TD, Pornprasertmanit S, Schoemann AM, Rosseel Y. semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-1; 2018. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
• Rizopoulos D. ltm: An R package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses. J Stat Softw 2006;17(5):1-25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05
• Kenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB. The Performance of RMSEA in Models with Small Degrees of Freedom. Sociol Methods Res 2015;44(3):486-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
• Taasoobshiraz G, Wang S. the performance of the srmr, rmsea, cfi, and tli: an examination of sample size, path size, and degrees of freedom. J Appl Quantitative Methods 2016;11(3):31-9.
• Gouveia VV, Milfont TL, Da Fonseca PN, de Miranda Coelho JAP. Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Soc Indic Res 2009;90(2):267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9257-0
• Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychol Assess 1993;5:164-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164
• McIntosh CN. Report on the construct validity of the Temporal Satisfaction with Life Scale. Soc Indic Res 2001;54:37-56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007264829700
• Lalor JP, Wu H, Yu H. Building an evaluation scale using item response theory. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2016:648-657. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d16-1062 PMid:28004039 PMCid:PMC5167538
• Campbell DT, Russo MJ. Social measurement. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing; 2001. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985857
• Sánchez-Fuentes M, Santos-Iglesias P, Sierra JC. A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2014;14(1):67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70038-9

Vancouver

Caycho-Rodríguez T, Vilca LW, Neto F, Peña-Calero BN, Schnettler B, Garcia Cadena CH, et al. Satisfaction with Sex Life Scale: New Psychometric Evidence in a Portuguese Population. ELECTRON J GEN MED. 2021;18(6):em331. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/11318

APA

Caycho-Rodríguez, T., Vilca, L. W., Neto, F., Peña-Calero, B. N., Schnettler, B., Garcia Cadena, C. H., Barboza-Palomino, M., Neto, J., & White, M. (2021). Satisfaction with Sex Life Scale: New Psychometric Evidence in a Portuguese Population. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 18(6), em331. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/11318

AMA

Caycho-Rodríguez T, Vilca LW, Neto F, et al. Satisfaction with Sex Life Scale: New Psychometric Evidence in a Portuguese Population. ELECTRON J GEN MED. 2021;18(6), em331. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/11318

Chicago

Caycho-Rodríguez, Tomás, Lindsey W. Vilca, Felix Neto, Brian Norman Peña-Calero, Berta Schnettler, Cirilo H. Garcia Cadena, Miguel Barboza-Palomino, Joana Neto, and Michael White. "Satisfaction with Sex Life Scale: New Psychometric Evidence in a Portuguese Population". Electronic Journal of General Medicine 2021 18 no. 6 (2021): em331. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/11318

Harvard

Caycho-Rodríguez, T., Vilca, L. W., Neto, F., Peña-Calero, B. N., Schnettler, B., Garcia Cadena, C. H., . . . White, M. (2021). Satisfaction with Sex Life Scale: New Psychometric Evidence in a Portuguese Population. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 18(6), em331. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/11318

MLA

Caycho-Rodríguez, Tomás et al. "Satisfaction with Sex Life Scale: New Psychometric Evidence in a Portuguese Population". Electronic Journal of General Medicine, vol. 18, no. 6, 2021, em331. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/11318