Comparing the effectiveness of high- and low-intensity laser therapy in enhancing conventional treatment for frozen shoulder: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
Full Text (PDF)
Angelina Mulyadi 1 2 , Laksmana Adi Krista Nugraha 3 4 , Kevin Christian Tjandra 3 4 , Tanti Ajoe Kesoema 4 5 *
More Detail
1 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya, INDONESIA2 Dr. Ramelan Navy Central Hospital, Surabaya, INDONESIA3 Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, INDONESIA4 Kariadi General Central Hospital, Semarang, INDONESIA5 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, INDONESIA* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Introduction: This study reviews the efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for frozen shoulders, including a meta-regression to identify variables affecting treatment outcomes.
Methods: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 444 participants with frozen shoulders received HILT or LLLT, combined with conventional therapies. Outcomes measured visual analogue scale (VAS)-pain scores, shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), short form health survey questionnaire (SF-36), and shoulder range of motion (ROM). The bias was analyzed with risk of bias version 2 and the analysis was performed with JAMOVI 2.4.14 and RevMan 5.4.
Results: Laser therapy showed significant improvements in outcomes: VAS scores (risk ratio [RR] -1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.95, -0.76), SPADI-pain (RR -10.20, 95% CI -15.95, -4.44), shoulder abduction ROM (RR 8.74, 95% CI 1.37, 16.11), and SF-36 role limitation due to physical health (RR 28.55, 95% CI 9.99, 47.12). The intensity of laser therapy influenced outcomes, with confounding factors affecting follow-up time and SF-36 emotional well-being.
Conclusion: Laser therapy, especially HILT, significantly reduces pain, improves shoulder range of motion, and enhances quality of life.

Keywords

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Review Article

ELECTRON J GEN MED, Volume 22, Issue 4, August 2025, Article No: em664

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/16418

Publication date: 01 Jul 2025

Online publication date: 28 May 2025

Article Views: 169

Article Downloads: 230

Open Access References How to cite this article