Electronic Journal of General Medicine

• Chang CY, Wu HT, Huang TF, Ma HL, Hung SC. Imaging evaluation of meniscal injury of the knee joint: a comparative MR imaging and arthroscopic study. Clin Imaging 2004;28:372-6.
• Parizel PM, Dijkstra HA, Geenen GP, et al. Low-field versus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. Eur J Radiol 1995;19:132-8.
• Stoller DW, Knee,1 st ed, in: Stoller DW, Tirman PF, Bredaella MA, Beltran S, Branstetter RM, Blease SC (Eds.),Diagnostic Imagig Orthopaedics,Amırsys Publishing Company, Canada, 2006; 5-2-41.
• Cevikol C, Karaali K, Esen G, et al. MR imaging of meniscal tears at low-field (0.35 T) and high-field (1.5 T) MR units. Tani Girisim Radyol 2004;10; 316-19.
• Quinn SF, Brown TR, Szumowski J. Menisci of the knee: radial MR imaging correlated with arthroscopy in 259 patients. Radiology 1992;185:577-80.
• Rubin DA. MR imaging of the knee menisci. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:21-44.
• Fischer SP, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD. Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:2-10.
• Rand T, Imhof H, Turetschek K, et al. Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the differentiation of torned from intact menisci. Eur J Radiol 1999;30:22-7.
• Kinnunen J, Bondestam S, Kivioja A, et al. Diagnostic performance of low field MRI in acute knee injuries. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:1155-60.
• Kladny B, Glückert K, Swoboda B, Beyer W, Weseloh G. Comparison of low-field (0.2Tesla) and high-field (1.5 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114:281-6.
• Cotten A, Delfaut E, Demondion X, et al. MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1093-7
• Krampla W, Roesel M, Svoboda K, Nachbagauer A, Gschwantler M, Hruby W. MRI of the knee: how do field strength and radiologist's experience influence diagnostic accuracy and interobserver correlation in assessing chondral and meniscal lesions and the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament? Eur Radiol 2009;19:1519-28.

Vancouver

Koplay M, Aksakallı E, Toker S, Özbek S, Kıvrak AS. Diagnostic Accuracy of 0.2 Tesla Open MR Imaging Unit in Detecting Meniscal Tears: Correlation with Arthroscopy. EUR J GEN MED. 2011;8(1):31-5. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/82693

APA

Koplay, M., Aksakallı, E., Toker, S., Özbek, S., & Kıvrak, A. S. (2011). Diagnostic Accuracy of 0.2 Tesla Open MR Imaging Unit in Detecting Meniscal Tears: Correlation with Arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine, 8(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/82693

AMA

Koplay M, Aksakallı E, Toker S, Özbek S, Kıvrak AS. Diagnostic Accuracy of 0.2 Tesla Open MR Imaging Unit in Detecting Meniscal Tears: Correlation with Arthroscopy. EUR J GEN MED. 2011;8(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/82693

Chicago

Koplay, Mustafa, Elif Aksakallı, Serdar Toker, Seda Özbek, and Ali Sami Kıvrak. "Diagnostic Accuracy of 0.2 Tesla Open MR Imaging Unit in Detecting Meniscal Tears: Correlation with Arthroscopy". European Journal of General Medicine 2011 8 no. 1 (2011): 31-35. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/82693

Harvard

Koplay, M., Aksakallı, E., Toker, S., Özbek, S., and Kıvrak, A. S. (2011). Diagnostic Accuracy of 0.2 Tesla Open MR Imaging Unit in Detecting Meniscal Tears: Correlation with Arthroscopy. European Journal of General Medicine, 8(1), pp. 31-35. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/82693

MLA

Koplay, Mustafa et al. "Diagnostic Accuracy of 0.2 Tesla Open MR Imaging Unit in Detecting Meniscal Tears: Correlation with Arthroscopy". European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, 2011, pp. 31-35. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/82693